captpicard: Was thinking today
So I was thinking today. I don't know how many of you were aware of this recent thing that happened with toys for tots and the Jesus dolls but I decided to give my own spin on it. While I believe the dolls are somewhat sacrelgious(sp) and should not of been made I do have one problem with them not wanting to accept them in the first place. That problem is that had they been Buddha or Muhammend dolls they would of been taken without question. For those of you who disagree with think about these. In California there was a school which got upset at a student for wearing a t-shirt saying homosexuality is a sin and in many schools you can get in trouble for trying to host something Christian such as a Bible study but they have no such problems when muslims, hindus, or buddhists want to do something in a school. Another example the USAF recently got in trouble because of evangicals in their officer school supposedly harrassing non-christians. I talked to some officers who were there when this happened and from them you find out that the Christians don't really do what everyone said happened its more the other faiths that do it. The thing is most of these things have no problem accepting something from a muslim faith or hindu or buddhist so why such a huge problem with Christian things?
So I was thinking today. I don't know how many of you were aware of this recent thing that happened with toys for tots and the Jesus dolls but I decided to give my own spin on it. While I believe the dolls are somewhat sacrelgious(sp) and should not of been made I do have one problem with them not wanting to accept them in the first place. That problem is that had they been Buddha or Muhammend dolls they would of been taken without question. For those of you who disagree with think about these. In California there was a school which got upset at a student for wearing a t-shirt saying homosexuality is a sin and in many schools you can get in trouble for trying to host something Christian such as a Bible study but they have no such problems when muslims, hindus, or buddhists want to do something in a school. Another example the USAF recently got in trouble because of evangicals in their officer school supposedly harrassing non-christians. I talked to some officers who were there when this happened and from them you find out that the Christians don't really do what everyone said happened its more the other faiths that do it. The thing is most of these things have no problem accepting something from a muslim faith or hindu or buddhist so why such a huge problem with Christian things?
The news is full of Michael Richards' use of the "N" word. Agree with him or not, would the same coverage be made if he was black? What if he were of Asian descent? Native American? I've heard several talking heads refer to Richards as a 'white comedian", so the implication is that words have different meaning depending on who uses them.
Niggar is an ugly word, but it is thrown in our faces every day in hip hop music. I know, they say "Niggah".
Bullshit. My kid would still get in trouble if I heard him say "Fudge You!" Just like Cooky's Cafe in Golden City, MO, I don't allow substitutions.
So why do black people call each other nigger and white people can't?
Just because.
Why do Christians get scrutinized while other religions get a pass?
Just because.
If you believe in the Bible, then you shouldn't complain about it too much. The meek shall inheret the Earth and all that.